Special diplomatic missions (or just Special Missions) have existed since the beginnings of diplomatic relations between States and they continue to be used from time-to-time.
In R (Freedom and Justice Party and others) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and the DPP [2016] EWHC 2010 (Admin) the High Court (Administrative Court) was faced with this question of law:
"Whether members of special missions
visiting the United Kingdom with the approval of the First Defendant
("the FCO") enjoy personal inviolability and/or immunity from criminal
process pursuant to a rule of customary international law to which
effect is given by the common law."
The court (Lloyd Jones LJ and Mr Justice Jay) held:
(1) Customary international law requires a receiving State to secure,
for the duration of a special mission, personal inviolability and
immunity from criminal jurisdiction for the members of the mission
accepted as such by the receiving State.
(2) This rule of customary international law is given effect by the common law.
This interesting judgment is available via Bailii -here
This blog does not offer legal advice and should never be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. Posts are not usually updated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
See also Later post 5 July - Tommy Robinson Appeal - Observations A common saying is "A lie can travel halfway around the world bef...
-
Procuring miscarriage is a criminal offence which carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment. The Offences against the Person Act ...
-
Modern English criminal law has a considerable number of statutory " Communications " offences. Malicious Communications Act 1988 ...
Terrorism Act 2000 Schedule 7 - Port and Border Controls
At Westminster Magistrates' Court, Mr Stephen Lennon was acquitted of a charge under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ('the TA...

You wouldn't really expect anything else, surely?
ReplyDeleteThe claimants obviously thought otherwise.
Delete