MP appointed to the "Chiltern Hundreds" - (Stoke, Desborough and Burnham).

On 18 May 2026 the Chancellor of the Exchequer appointed Joshua Cameron Simons to be Steward and Bailiff of the Three Hundreds of Chiltern - Three Hundreds of Chiltern - GOV.UK. 

Mr Simons had agreed to vacate his seat as Member for Makerfield so that the present Mayor of Greater Manchester (Andy Burnham) could, if selected as a candidate by the Labour Party, stand for election at a by-election. The politics behind this are not the concern of this blog but the aim is to try to secure the Labour Party leadership for Burnham and he would then displace Sir Keir Starmer as Prime Minister. 

The House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975 section 4 provides that - ' ... the office of steward or bailiff of Her Majesty’s three Chiltern Hundreds of Stoke, Desborough and Burnham, or of the Manor of Northstead, shall be treated as included among the offices described in Part III of Schedule 1 to this Act.'

The effect is that the holder of one of those offices is disqualified for membership of the House of Commons.

As far as I know, there is no connection between Andy Burnham and the fact that one of the three Chiltern Hundreds is known as Burnham  - see Chiltern Hundreds - Wikipedia.

The European Convention on Human Rights - Chişinău Declaration - 15 May 2026

 

The 46 member states of the Council of Europe, including UK, have adopted a non-binding political declaration clarifying the operation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), with particular relevance to immigration and asylum law.

The Declaration is referred to as the Chişinău Declaration following its adoption in the Moldovan capital. It signals a shared position among member states on how the Convention should be interpreted and applied, including by domestic courts and the European Court of Human Rights.

New Council of Europe declaration clarifies ECHR interpretation in immigration and asylum law | Electronic Immigration Network

and see the UK government Press Release

Reforms to secure British borders to be agreed by Foreign Ministers in Moldova this week - GOV.UK

The Elbit Systems offenders and Sentencing Act 2020 section 69

Last week, in the Crown Court at Woolwich, Leona Kamio (30), Samuel Corner (23), Fatema Rajwani (21), and Charlotte Head (29) were convicted of criminal damage committed in August 2024 at premises of Elbit Systems Ltd. The jury verdict was unanimous. Samuel Corner was also convicted under section 20 offence of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. The four are yet to be sentenced by the trial judge - Mr Justice Johnson - and, in English criminal law, sentencing is entirely a matter for the judge and not a jury.

It is reported that section 69 of the Sentencing Act 2020 is to be applied to their sentencing. 

Section 69 is headed "Terrorist Connection" and is within Part 4 of the 2020 Act (Exercising the court's discretion) Chapter 3 (Seriousness and Determining Sentence). Terrorist Connection is one of a number of aggravating factors set out in Chapter 3.

The original section 69:

The original section 69 came into force on 1 December 2020 and stated:

In the matter of contempt proceedings against Rajiv Menon KC - Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2026] EWCA Civ 573

In a previous post  (6 May 2026) it was noted that contempt of court had been alleged against Rajiv Menon KC. 

In December 2025, a trial was taking place in the Crown Court at Woolwich before Johnson J (“the trial judge”). Six defendants were charged with offences arising out of an incident on 6 August 2024 at a factory in Filton, Bristol, occupied and operated by Elbit Systems Ltd. 

Rajiv Menon KC was leading counsel representing Charlotte Head, the first defendant named on the indictment. 

There were rulings of law before and during the trial, including in relation to what is sometimes called jury equity; to the defence of lawful excuse to a count of criminal damage; and to the relevance and admissibility of certain evidence. 

 Following submissions as to the legal directions to be given to the jury, the trial judge gave a ruling on 22 December 2025 in which he said ...

Supreme Court of the UK rules in favour of government in Legacy case

2023 Legislation and a Troubles Bill:

The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 responded to the legacy of “The Troubles”, a period of conflict in Northern Ireland that began in the late 1960s and continued until the Belfast (or Good Friday) Agreement of 10 April 1998. More than 3,500 people were killed during the Troubles, with approximately 40,000 injured. Around 1,200 killings remain unsolved. 

The 2023 Act created the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (“ICRIR”), whose functions include carrying out reviews of deaths and serious injuries caused by conduct forming part of the Troubles.  

Inquisitorial reviews by the ICRIR have replaced police investigations, investigations by the Police Ombudsman, inquests and civil claims relating to Troubles-related conduct, and the 2023 Act has brought existing investigations, inquests and claims to an end.

The Act also introduced

Four convicted of criminal damage at premises of Elbit Systems Ltd + Action against defence counsel

On 5 May 2026, four Palestine Action activists were convicted of criminal damage committed at premises of Elbit Systems Ltd which, at the time (6 August 2024), were located at Filton (Bristol). I understand that the premises are now closed - The Guardian 6 September 2025. 

Elbit Systems is an Israeli arms producer including advanced drone technology.

The four convicted were Leona Kamio (30), Samuel Corner (23), Fatema Rajwani (21), and Charlotte Head (29). The jury returned unanimous verdicts.

Samuel Corner was acquitted of causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent (Offences against the Person Act 1861 section 18) for striking a police officer with a sledgehammer but he was convicted (by a majority of 11 to one) of the section 20 offence.

Two other defendants, Jordan Devlin (31), and Zoe Rogers (22), were acquitted of criminal damage.

During the trial, the

Rule of Law - House of Lords Constitution Committee 13th Report of Sessions 2024-26

Almost a year ago, this blog published  The "Rule of Law" - Notes for students in whjch it was noted that there is no precise definition of the term Rule of Law. The post pointed to various authoritative sources of information about that the Rule of Law, as a concept, ought to contain in modern times.

In November 2025, the House of Lords Constitution Committee published - Rule of law: holding the line between anarchy and tyranny - Committees - UK Parliament. This is the Committee's 13th Report of Session 2024-26. 

Jonathan Sumption, the former Justice of the Supreme Court, in his book "The Challenges of Democracy and the Rule of Law" notes that there are rival approaches to the rule of law which are referred to as the 'thin' and 'thick' definitions.