The Department for Exiting the EU (DExEU) has published a programme for the Third Round of Brexit negotiations to be held in Brussels from 28th to 31st August 2017. In addition, the DExEU has published papers dealing with various aspects of Brexit - Article 50 and Negotiations with the EU
The EU
side of the negotiations basically operates in accordance with the European
Council (Art. 50) Guidelines issued on 29th April 2017 and other official documents
– see LIBRARY below. At this
stage, the EU guidance requires their negotiators to focus on Citizen's Rights,
Financial Settlement and the Situation of Ireland. The UK side appears to
be keen to move the talks into other areas though the financial settlement ("divorce
bill") is likely to be a major sticking point - The
Guardian 28th August. This May
2017 post looked at the financial situation as it appeared at that time.
The Department for Exiting the EU lists seven "position papers" ; four "future partnership papers" and two White
Papers - HERE. The papers amply demonstrate the gargantuan task of dismantling
the existing UK-EU arrangements and replacing them. It remains to be seen
what the future holds for UK-EU cooperation but the various papers make a start
at teasing out some of the various problems and at suggesting some possible
solutions. This post looks briefly at three of the papers: Ongoing
proceedings; Civil judicial cooperation; Enforcement and Dispute Resolution.
Proceedings Ongoing at time of Brexit:
The
position paper on Ongoing
Union judicial and administrative proceedings (13th July) seeks to achieve
agreement with the EU on the handling of proceedings which are ongoing when the
UK leaves the EU. The paper states - "The UK does not consider that the
CJEU should remain competent to rule on cases on which it has not been seized
before the day of withdrawal, even where the facts arose before withdrawal.
This would lead to an uncertain environment in which it would be impossible to
predict how long the CJEU would continue to issue judgments in respect of the
UK. That is not in the interests of the autonomy of domestic law in the
UK. Of course, that does not mean that those cases should not be dealt
with fairly and impartially. Where those cases concern individuals or businesses,
the domestic courts in the UK will continue to determine cases in accordance
with UK law as it stood at the time the facts arose, impartially, fairly and
independently. The UK will provide certainty domestically by incorporating the
EU acquis and CJEU case law into domestic law on exit. This historic case
law will be given the same binding, or precedent, status in UK courts as
decisions of the UK Supreme Court, which can, where appropriate, depart from
its previous judgments."
Civil
judicial cooperation following Brexit:
A Future
Partnership Paper considers a framework for Cross-Border
civil judicial cooperation. This is a complex area requiring
consideration of numerous international instruments such as those dealing with
recognition of judgments, the law applicable to contracts, the law applicable
to non-contractual obligations, matrimonial and parental responsibility and
many other areas.
"The
UK, as a non-member state outside the direct jurisdiction of the Court of
Justice of the European Union (CJEU), will seek to agree new close and
comprehensive arrangements for civil judicial cooperation with the EU. We
have a shared interest with the EU in ensuring these new arrangements are
thorough and effective. In particular, citizens and businesses need to have
continuing confidence as they interact across borders about which country’s
courts would deal with any dispute, which laws would apply, and know that
judgments and orders obtained will be recognised and enforced in neighbouring
countries, as is the case now."
"The UK is clear that it is in the interests of both
the UK and the EU for cooperation in this field to continue as part of the
future partnership. Nonetheless, in response, Annex A of the future partnership
paper presents the UK’s view of the principles that should govern the winding
down of our existing relationship in the event that no agreement on a future
relationship can be reached."
The EU has presented its position on civil judicial cooperation - see HERE (28th June 2017).
The EU has presented its position on civil judicial cooperation - see HERE (28th June 2017).
Enforcement
and Dispute Resolution:
A further
future partnership paper looks at Enforcement
and Dispute Resolution. The agreements governing the UK’s withdrawal
from, and future partnership with, the EU will cover a broad range of areas of
cooperation. Those agreements should set out clear means by which the terms of
the agreements should be implemented and enforced within the UK and the EU.
They should also establish a mechanism for the resolution of disputes
concerning those agreements. As outlined in this paper, the approaches
towards enforcement and dispute resolution should: maximise certainty for
individuals and businesses; ensure that they can effectively enforce
their rights in a timely way; respect the autonomy of EU law and UK legal
systems while taking control of our own laws; and continue to respect the
UK’s international obligations.
EU Commission:
The Commission is posting updates on Brexit - HERE
EU Commission:
The Commission is posting updates on Brexit - HERE
: Library :
EU negotiating position –
European
Council (Art. 50) Guidelines issued on 29th April 2017
Department for Exiting the EU –
Law Society –
General Council of the Bar –
Articles –
Professor
Steve Peers 22nd August - Cross
Border Civil Litigation after Brexit
Monckton
Chambers - Brexit Blog - Anneli Howard - Status
of EU Law and ongoing role for the Court of Justice?
Verfassungsblog
by Tobias Lock.
Piet
Eeckhout Brexit
and the ECJ Red Line
Policy Exchange - Judicial Power Project responds to government paper on European Court of Justice post Brexit
Policy Exchange - Judicial Power Project responds to government paper on European Court of Justice post Brexit
No comments:
Post a Comment