The House of Commons Justice Committee has expressed grave misgivings about whether the Criminal Courts Charge is compatible with the principles of justice - READ THE REPORT. The levels of the charge are criticised as grossly disproportionate to the means of many of the offenders to which the charge is applicable as well as to the gravity of many of the offences for which it is imposed. The charge is also thought to be creating perverse incentives affecting defendant and sentencer behaviour.
The committee would not mourn early abolition of the charge and calls for legislation to either remove it or, if the government is not so minded, to reduce the levels of the charge. If it is not either abolished or reduced then the committee calls for legislation to permit discretion for sentencers (a) as to whether to impose the charge and (b) if it is imposed, the level of the charge.
The message is clear enough. Abolish this unjust charge.
Previous post explaining the charge
This blog does not offer legal advice and should never be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. Posts are not usually updated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
See also Later post 5 July - Tommy Robinson Appeal - Observations A common saying is "A lie can travel halfway around the world bef...
-
Some States have provisions in their national law for declaring emergencies. See, for example, the Declaration by the President Trump of ...
-
On Tuesday 9 December 2025, the Home Secretary (Shabana Mahmood MP) informed the House of Commons of the appointment of a Chair for the Groo...

No comments:
Post a Comment