The House of Commons Justice Committee has expressed grave misgivings about whether the Criminal Courts Charge is compatible with the principles of justice - READ THE REPORT. The levels of the charge are criticised as grossly disproportionate to the means of many of the offenders to which the charge is applicable as well as to the gravity of many of the offences for which it is imposed. The charge is also thought to be creating perverse incentives affecting defendant and sentencer behaviour.
The committee would not mourn early abolition of the charge and calls for legislation to either remove it or, if the government is not so minded, to reduce the levels of the charge. If it is not either abolished or reduced then the committee calls for legislation to permit discretion for sentencers (a) as to whether to impose the charge and (b) if it is imposed, the level of the charge.
The message is clear enough. Abolish this unjust charge.
Previous post explaining the charge
This blog does not offer legal advice and should never be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. Posts are not usually updated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
See also Later post 5 July - Tommy Robinson Appeal - Observations A common saying is "A lie can travel halfway around the world bef...
-
Procuring miscarriage is a criminal offence which carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment. The Offences against the Person Act ...
-
Updates 22 August, 23 August 2025, 31st August 2025. 11 November 2025 It is reported in the press that the High Court has granted an interim...
The jury is out ..... Secretary of State for Justice announces proposals for criminal justice reform
Back in July, Sir Brian Leveson (a former Lord Justice of Appeal) published the first part of his Independent Review of the Criminal Courts...

No comments:
Post a Comment