An appeal by the three former MPs charged with offences relating to parliamentary expenses is likely to be heard by the Supreme Court. It appears that the point of law to be determined is - "Does the crown court have the jurisdiction to try an MP in relation to allegations of dishonest claims for parliamentary expenses or allowances, or is the court deprived of jurisdiction by article nine of the bill of rights 1688 or the exclusive jurisdiction of parliament?" Law and Lawyers previously reported on this case here, here, here and here. See The Guardian 14th September 2010.
Addendum 15th September: - CharonQC takes a brief look at "what if" the Supreme Court rules in favour of the MPs.
Addendum 16th September: - "MPs' expenses case hinges on limits of parliamentary privilege" - Joshua Rozenberg - The Guardian 16th September. A nine judge court is to sit.
Addendum 20th September: - "Secret Deals still being offered to MPs" - Rosa Prince in The Telegraph 20th September.
This blog does not offer legal advice and should never be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. Posts are not usually updated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
See also Later post 5 July - Tommy Robinson Appeal - Observations A common saying is "A lie can travel halfway around the world bef...
-
Procuring miscarriage is a criminal offence which carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment. The Offences against the Person Act ...
-
Updates 22 August, 23 August 2025, 31st August 2025. 11 November 2025 It is reported in the press that the High Court has granted an interim...
The jury is out ..... Secretary of State for Justice announces proposals for criminal justice reform
Back in July, Sir Brian Leveson (a former Lord Justice of Appeal) published the first part of his Independent Review of the Criminal Courts...

Wow i love you blog its awesome nice colors you must have did hard work on your blog. Keep up the good work. Thanks
ReplyDelete