This blog does not offer legal advice and should never be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. Posts are not usually updated.
22 April 2010
Reviewing Sex Offender Notification Requirements: Supreme Court decision
Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 s.82, a person sentenced to 30 months imprisonment or more for a sexual offence has a lifelong "notification requirement". In R (on the application of F) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 17, the Supreme Court has issued a declaration of incompatibility, finding this to be a breach of the person's rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The court considered that there ought to be a process for the notification requirement to be reviewed if a person is able to show that they are no longer a risk. Under the scheme of the Human Rights Act 1998, it is now for Ministers/Parliament to determine whether to amend the law.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
See also Later post 5 July - Tommy Robinson Appeal - Observations A common saying is "A lie can travel halfway around the world bef...
-
Update 21st April 2014: The defence discussed in this post is to be abolished from 13th May 2014 though the abolition is not retrospectiv...
-
Procuring miscarriage is a criminal offence which carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment. The Offences against the Person Act ...
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill has passed through Parliament
All that remains for the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill is the formality of Royal Assent and the bill then becomes an Act of Parli...

No comments:
Post a Comment