This blog does not offer legal advice and should never be used as a substitute for professional legal advice. Posts are not usually updated.
22 April 2010
Reviewing Sex Offender Notification Requirements: Supreme Court decision
Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 s.82, a person sentenced to 30 months imprisonment or more for a sexual offence has a lifelong "notification requirement". In R (on the application of F) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 17, the Supreme Court has issued a declaration of incompatibility, finding this to be a breach of the person's rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The court considered that there ought to be a process for the notification requirement to be reviewed if a person is able to show that they are no longer a risk. Under the scheme of the Human Rights Act 1998, it is now for Ministers/Parliament to determine whether to amend the law.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
See also Later post 5 July - Tommy Robinson Appeal - Observations A common saying is "A lie can travel halfway around the world bef...
-
Some States have provisions in their national law for declaring emergencies. See, for example, the Declaration by the President Trump of ...
-
On 20 December 2024 the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) authorised charges against two men who were involved in a serious incident with Poli...

No comments:
Post a Comment