Justice Goddard is a Justice of the High Court of New Zealand.
See the Home Secretary's Statement to the House of Commons 4th February 2015. The statement makes it clear that the original inquiry is terminated and the panel dissolved. Now there is to be a new statutory inquiry with a new panel. Please note, in particular, the following extract from Mrs May's statement - (my emphasis and some links added):
"I will now turn to the form of the inquiry. As I
told the Home Affairs Committee on 15 December, I am clear that the
inquiry should have the power to compel witnesses to give evidence. I
also said there were three ways to do that: first, by establishing a
royal commission; secondly, by converting the current inquiry into a
statutory inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005, subject to consultation
with the chairman once appointed; or, thirdly, by setting up a new
statutory inquiry under the 2005 Act.
"Having
taken in-depth legal advice and discussed the options with survivors, I
have concluded that a royal commission would not have the same
robustness in law as a statutory inquiry. In particular, it would not
have the same clarity over its powers to compel witnesses to give
evidence. I have decided not to convert the current inquiry, because
doing so would not address the concerns of survivors about the degree of
transparency in the original appointments process. I have therefore
decided upon the third option of establishing a new statutory inquiry
with a panel.
I want to make it clear that that
is by no means a criticism of the current panel members, who were
selected on the basis of their expertise and commitment to getting to
the truth about child abuse in this country. The fact that the panel is
being dissolved has nothing to do with their ability or integrity, and I
want to place on the record my gratitude to them for the work they have
done so far. I have asked the panel to produce a report on their work
so far, which I am sure will provide valuable assistance to the incoming
chairman.
In order to make sure that the
appointment of the new panel is as transparent as possible, I will
publish in full the criteria by which each new member will be selected
and place a copy in the House Library and on gov.uk. I hope that the
original members and the expert adviser to the panel, Professor Alexis
Jay, will put themselves forward to be considered against those criteria
if they so wish. I can confirm that Ben Emmerson QC will remain as
counsel to the inquiry. I will wish to discuss the make-up of the new
panel with Justice Goddard, but I am clear that each member must have
the right skills and expertise to do the job, satisfy the statutory
requirements of impartiality, and command the confidence of survivors.
So
the process is being reset, and that means that I will also revisit the
terms of reference. In accordance with the Inquiries Act, these will
need to be discussed with Justice Goddard, but I want to assure
survivors and the House that I have heard the strong call that the
inquiry’s remit should go back further than the current time limit of
1970. There are, however, good reasons for confining the inquiry’s scope
to England and Wales. The Hart inquiry in Northern Ireland and the Oldham inquiry in Jersey are already under way, while the Scottish
Government have announced their own inquiry into child abuse—but I shall
discuss this with the new chairman. In the event that the geographical
scope remains the same, I propose that a clear protocol is agreed to
make sure that no information falls through the cracks and that no
people or institutions escape scrutiny, censure or justice."
Mrs May also revealed that that Justice Goddard will attend a hearing before the Home Affairs Committee, on 11th February.
Previous post - 1st September 2014
See the Parliamentary Pre-appointment hearing
Mrs May also revealed that that Justice Goddard will attend a hearing before the Home Affairs Committee, on 11th February.
Previous post - 1st September 2014
See the Parliamentary Pre-appointment hearing
It is to be hoped that the new panel will all be of open and independent mind and not parti pris.
ReplyDelete