tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6110794854146484721.post7129807217933313711..comments2024-03-29T08:05:56.264+00:00Comments on Law and Lawyers: Drinking and driving ~ the government's consultationObiterJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04544226917595022902noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6110794854146484721.post-85727225281101209312013-01-12T11:07:03.480+00:002013-01-12T11:07:03.480+00:00Well I also would like to suggest that before cond...Well I also would like to suggest that before conducting any blood alcoholic test first ask the reason of creating an accident.<br /><a href="http://www.crimlaw.com.au/traffic-offences/dui-offences.html" rel="nofollow">dui lawyer</a> | <a href="http://www.crimlaw.com.au/traffic-offences/dui-offences.html" rel="nofollow">drink driving lawyer</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6110794854146484721.post-41739286890067856372012-12-26T00:31:43.962+00:002012-12-26T00:31:43.962+00:00No need for us to do that. At the risk of being co...No need for us to do that. At the risk of being considered a zealot I would reduce the limit from 80 and disqualify anyone over the reduced limit.Andrew Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17273362558325263161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6110794854146484721.post-58226273812814218552012-12-21T22:27:21.813+00:002012-12-21T22:27:21.813+00:00Those countries with 50mg limits have lower penal...Those countries with 50mg limits have lower penalties, (liike a fine/points), up to a threshold which is remarkably similar to our own limit of 85, when the more severe penalties kick in. But the zealots don't want to tell you this bit, only the lower 50mg limit. So lets have the full truth, please.Frasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6110794854146484721.post-67966340310216927812012-12-21T17:47:04.168+00:002012-12-21T17:47:04.168+00:00First: the limit should whatever it needs to be to...First: the limit should whatever it needs to be to allow for mouthwash, liqueur chocolates, and internal fermentation, in combination – and no more. Well below 50.<br /><br />Second: the penalty should be three years’ disqualification (not one) on a first offence and seven (not three) on a second, and not just within ten years.<br /><br />Third: of course the option should be abolished.<br /><br />Fourth: driving while disqualified after a drink/drive conviction should carry mandatory imprisonment with no exceptions (not even for a female defendant with more children than the old woman who lived in a shoe).<br /><br />But fifth: keep the roadside filter and the evidential test at the stationAndrew Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17273362558325263161noreply@blogger.com